Framework Concepts and Program Outcomes Paper

Review the concepts and program outcomes you have been working on for the past two weeks in the peer collaboration area and make any final changes before submitting the paper at the end of Week 4. The following are components of the paper.

1. Identification of framework concepts
2. Definition of each concept
3. Relationship between the concepts
4. Program outcomes developed based on AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR current Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals
5. Influence of peer collaboration on the final product
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition

Please see the guidelines and grading rubric for details.

Framework Concepts and Program Outcomes Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.)

Framework Concepts and Program Outcomes Paper template (Links to an external site.)

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to (a) develop concepts included in an organizing framework for an institution, (b) discuss the relationship between the concepts, (c) develop program outcomes, and (d) demonstrate skills in the development and articulation of ideas in a scholarly manner.

Total Points Possible: 230

Requirements

Assignment Criteria for the Paper

1. Brief introduction on the concepts selected for the framework
2. The concepts in the framework are clearly defined. The concepts included in the metaparadigm of nursing (person, nursing, health, and environment) must be included.
3. The relationship between the concepts is demonstrated.
4. Develop program outcomes for your institution that incorporate the following:
5. Program outcomes should be described as characteristics expected of graduates by the end of the program
6. Program outcomes are based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals.
7. Changes to the initial framework concepts and program outcomes are identified, based on peer collaboration.
8. A conclusion to the paper is required.
9. A minimum of three scholarly references is required.
10. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition

Directions and Grading Criteria

Category	Points	%	Description
Concepts	35	15	The concepts for the framework are clearly identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts.
Concepts	35	15	All concepts for the framework are clearly defined.
Concepts	35	15	The relationship between the concepts is clearly articulated.
Program outcomes	35	15	Program outcomes describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program
Program outcomes	35	15	Program outcomes are based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals
Peer collaboration influence	35	15	Influence of peer collaboration on organizing framework and program outcomes is clearly identified in the paper
Graduate-level writing style	20	10	The required content includes the following. Correct spelling, grammar, and punctuationExceptional writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paperCongruence with APA mechanics of styleIntroduction to the assignmentConclusion to the assignmentRequired referencesAPA format for citing and referencing sources
Total	230	100	A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Rubric

 Organizing Framework and Program Outcomes Guidelines

Organizing Framework and Program Outcomes Guidelines
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe concepts for the framework are clearly identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts.	35 pts The concepts for the framework are clearly identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts. 28 pts The concepts for the framework are partially identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts. 17 pts The concepts for the framework are minimally identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts. 0 pts The concepts for the framework are not identified in the introduction including, but not limited to, the metaparadigm of nursing concepts.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll concepts for the framework are clearly defined.	35 pts The concepts of health, person, environment, and nursing are included in the framework concepts and are clearly defined. 28 pts Only 3 of the metaparadigm concepts are included in the framework OR any of the concepts are only partially defined. 17 pts Only 2 of the metaparadigm concepts are included in the framework OR any of the concepts are only minimally defined. 0 pts The concepts are not defined.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe relationship between the concepts is clearly articulated.	35 pts The relationship between the concepts is clearly articulated. 28 pts The relationship between the concepts is partially articulated. 17 pts The relationship between the concepts is minimally articulated. 0 pts The relationship between the concepts is not clearly articulated.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram outcomes describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program.	35 pts Program outcomes clearly describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program. 28 pts Program outcomes only partially describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program. 17 pts Program outcomes only minimally describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program. 0 pts Program outcomes do not describe the qualities or characteristics needed by graduates by the end of the program OR are missing from the paper.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram outcomes are based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competences for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals.	35 pts Program outcomes are clearly based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals. 28 pts Program outcomes are partially based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals. 17 pts Program outcomes are minimally based on either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals. 0 pts Program outcomes have no relationship to either the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education OR the NLN Competencies for graduates of Associate Degree Programs OR the current The Joint Commission Hospital National Patient Safety Goals.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer collaboration influence on framework concepts and program outcomes.	35 pts Influence of peer collaboration on final framework concepts and program outcomes is clearly identified in the paper. 28 pts Influence of peer collaboration on final framework concepts and program outcomes is identified but with occasional inaccuracies or lack of clarity. 17 pts Influence of peer collaboration on final framework concepts and program outcomes statement does not identify specific details. 0 pts Influence of peer collaboration is missing from the paper.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly writing at the graduate level	20 pts 0–1 error or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. Required scholarly references are included. 16 pts 2–3 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. Only 2 scholarly references are included. 10 pts 4–5 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. Only one scholarly reference is included. 0 pts 6 or more errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. References are not included, or they are not scholarly.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions	0 pts Student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days) 0 pts submission met deadline	0 pts
Total Points: 230